Fraternis quotations
from Burak
ELDEM
Since the first kingdoms, first class societies, even the first
patriarchal societies, Fraternis groups and fractions have tried to change the
world order, re-glorify the old 'golden age' values, and protect and develop their
ancestors' knowledge and beliefs. Just like the last revolutionary emperor
Julianus; ‘Brotherhood members’ who founded the Republic in Rome and tried to
develop it; Pythagoras disciples taking steps to realize their ideals in
Southern Italy, founders of the Amphictyonic Council, which found out the first
confederate organizations in Ancient Greece; the creators of the Eleusis
mystery cult, Dionysian communities, Orpheus cells and Mithra lodges; those who
try to protect the belief of "Great Mother" from Troy to Phrygia in
Western Anatolia, like the wise women of a civilization from Çatalhöyük (near
Urfa, South Estern Anatolia) to the back until periods we don't know, Fraternis
'deep-rooted thought and ideal protectors' reunited in Albi, France.
‘Masonry' emerging from the beginning as the final link of a
tradition and whose main purpose was determined as 'correcting the wrong course
of civilization and restoring the old basic principles' sustained over 5,000
years under various appearances by a minority of intellectuals in class
societies, how did turn into, with the slightest expression, a 'passive and
repulsive' organization reconciled with the system, took a side clearly with
the conservative ideology of the ruling class?
Aside from
its far-right, Catholic-driven, fundamentalist Anti-Masonic claims and rhetoric,
the ‘freemason prototype’ up to now, even with its most objective view, is
incompatible with the characteristics of Fraternis longing to realize the ideal
of the egalitarian, sharing and fraternal world.
Freemasonry
is, above all ‘gender apartheidist.’ Because it does not accept women and only
men can become members.
Freemasonry
is ‘faith discriminator.’ Because it only includes those who believe in
monotheistic religions. Buddhists, Hindus, Shinto believers, pagans, atheists
or agnostics are not accepted.
Although it
is said that to declare the belief in a supreme being is sufficient condition,
trying to give the impression that it has the flexibility of the Deist
Freemason thought in the Enlightenment period, especially the American lodges
are clearly under the control of the Evangelist-Baptist or Presbyterian
brothers. As an extension of Fraternis based on the goddess culture whose roots
are in stark contrast to Judaism, this is really ironic.
Freemasonry
is 'ideological discriminator', because it tries to make itself 'apolitical'
with great effort, while it strictly prohibits political and philosophical
discussions in the lodges. At the meetings of the lodges, where the endless
stifling rhetoric is repeated, the "protestant morality" that has
fully resolved the capitalist system is emphasized. The traces of the old
Fraternis ideal and its "mission" are now completely erased and
destroyed.
Freemasonry
is nothing but an ugly, bourgeois association, fully integrated into the unpleasant,
antipathic, dominant system, where people come together in the lodges at
certain intervals, play some kind of 'secret organizationalism' with those
strange dramatizations in the initiation rituals; listen to abundant moral
counsel; mostly prefer to be a member thinking 'it helps in my business life
and career' or 'for gaining influence'; by engaging occasionally in certain
charitable works, stimulating the sensation that 'they are useful' in some
people.
The beginning
of this transformation occurred when the survivors of the temple knights were
involved; after Rose cross mysticism was imported into the ideology of the
organization this transformation accelerated, this became visible after meeting
the same ranks with the protestant reforms, and it took its final form with the
abandonment of the Enlightenment ideals after the completion of the important
bourgeois revolutions in the West. But to see this change and the ‘castration’
of the Fraternis ideals by Freemasonry after standing for 5000 years more
clearly, we need to take another short tour of history.
From the
very beginning of 19th century, ‘capitalism’, with the industry as its locomotive
and trade as its wagons, replaced ‘feudalism’ based on its relations with the
aristocracy and the simple agricultural economy. In the world of the 20th
century, under the strict rule of the bourgeois republics and parliamentary
democracies, ‘finance-capital’ was now sitting in the machinist seat of that
train. Namely, bank capital. The period was the period of ‘multinational
companies’ and extremely ironically, the ideal of 'internationalist
integration' advocated primarily by Fraternis and various groups for thousands
of years, the creamy layer of the bourgeoisie had already realized among
itself. The 'finance-capital oligarchy', having total control over giant corporate
groups, would rule the world economy and trade, which is required to be
'globalized'; the 'interlocking and integration' operation would continue until
there was not a single source on earth not controlled by the 'lords of money'.
This is the
modern myth called the 'New World Order': Several thousand 'families'
controlling finance-capital; several million 'white collar' who can set
themselves high living standards by working on these 'families' account and
close to six and a half billion 'other earthmen' determined by this minority
how to live, what to think, how to have fun and how to survive.
Marxism was
born in the 19th century as a reaction to the betrayal of the Enlightenment
ideals. So, Marxism stood against the bourgeoisie who seized power and stepped
on the brakes of social development, and put the 'working class' in charge of
the mission for maintaining the revolution till the end with a comprehensive
ideology. Karl Marx had already anticipated that the monopolization tendencies
of capitalism would bring things to the present point. In 1912, Rudolf
Hilferding identified the phenomenon of finance-capital and named it. In his
famous work in 1917, Lenin deciphered the characteristics of ‘Imperialism’ by
making a detailed analysis of the transformation. But, despite that, the
experienced transformation could not be prevented to be transmuted into tyranny
called today's dramatic 'New World Order'. The collapse of socialism not as
ideologically but as a ‘real world system’ since 1990 would have facilitated
the work of today's ‘Global Elite’, the ‘Finance Caesars’, who led the
Multinational Company Empire.
Another
ironic point: America designed to host the world's first egalitarian,
libertarian and sharing society as a utopian 'New Rome' model beyond the ocean
converted to the 'headquarters' of this finance-capital oligarchy from
beginning of the 19th century. But this was not the ‘ideal republic’ that was
thought to be developed and brought forward as a prototype, nor the ‘Masonic
State’ designed by leaders such as Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, and Revere,
the leadership of the revolution in 1770s. The magic was reversed, the greedy
and aggressive Roman Empire emerged from the depths of history and endowed with
the forces of the modern world.
If the
Fraternis tradition was abolished and its last link, the Masonic organizations
were assimilated by the financial-capital oligarchy of modern capitalism, what
happened to the famous books hid meticulously, once considered so important and
the source of 'strengthening information' by Sibyls, Pythagoras, Roman
republicans, Cathars and their successors? Do the originals still exist? If
these books are 'secured' somewhere, who is holding them now? Most importantly,
what do these books say? There is no doubt that these books really existed
once. We know for sure that they were hid in Capitoline in Rome until the civil
war. The theme of ‘losing and re-finding the secret’, which forms the basis of
the Fraternis rituals, shows that the books are probably not destroyed and are
meticulously protected by a small number of believed disciples. If the
'precious treasure' smuggled and rescued from the Montsegur massacre are these
books as we guessed and the Cathar sages cooperated with the Templars to
protect them, the Sibylline Books (or whatever its name) must have been
transferred directly to the Masons.
If the
Masonic lodges have been “tamed” and integrated into the system in the last 200
years, what happened to these valuable documents? There are two possibilities: Either
it is still hiding somewhere ‘to be used when needed’ by top Mason leaders or,
with the worst case scenario, while the Templars were secretly sailing to the
New World, these books designed as the 'center of Masonic utopia', hid and
secured somewhere in America, are already in the hands of the lords of the 'New
World Order'. If this is the case, we can completely give up our hopes that
these books will come to light.
It may be
an encyclopedic "time capsule", possibly containing the oldest known
records of the history of the world and humanity.
Number of
Pages: 648
Publication
Year: 2006
Language:
Turkish
Publisher:
İnkılap Bookstore
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder